Documented per EIA figures: around 20 million barrels per day of oil, about a fifth of global consumption, plus roughly a quarter of global LNG, mostly Qatari, transit Hormuz, with few viable bypass pipelines. Iran has repeatedly threatened closure during escalations, including the 2026 war's parliamentary votes to close it, and has never executed a full closure, per the record, because Iran's own exports and Chinese imports depend on it. War-risk insurance and rerouting costs model the closure as an immediate global price shock.
The folk framing, Jiang's included: Hormuz is the rung where regional war becomes world recession, so both sides climb toward it and stop short, the ladder as theater with a real edge. The documented counter: insurance markets, not intentions, are the true sensor, and they price the theater accurately.
The claim: the strait is the pressure point where the petrodollar order lives, and every Anunnaki-to-central-bank grand narrative eventually routes its map through this water, the ancient Gulf of the teacher gods become the modern Gulf of the tankers. The pattern claim, not the logistics, is the eso layer.
Is the twentieth century's energy order a system, or one strait pretending to be a system?