Charles Hapgood's 1966 bestseller argued the map copies lost source maps showing Antarctica's coast as it looks under the ice, implying a prehistoric seafaring civilization with advanced cartography. The theory remains a staple of ancient-mystery media.
Piri Reis wrote his sources on the map itself: about twenty charts, including Portuguese maps and one belonging to Columbus. His notes describe compiling them. The map is a documented product of the Age of Discovery's information explosion.
The story the map's fans tell: Piri Reis copied from far older charts, survivors of Alexandria's library, possibly from a seafaring civilization whose maps showed coasts nobody had yet charted. The admiral himself wrote that he used about twenty old maps, including one from Columbus.
If one genuine artifact can generate sixty years of theories, what does an artifact actually prove: the past, or our hunger for a different past?