Documented: the tsunami struck Honshu around midnight of January 27-28, 1700, recorded in village and castle town records with damage but no earthquake. Satake and colleagues' 1996-2003 work inverted the wave heights to require a roughly magnitude 9 rupture off North America; the match to the ghost forests' 1699-1700 ring death and the native accounts fixed the source: the Cascadia megathrust, evening of January 26, 1700, the wave crossing the Pacific in about ten hours. Synthesis published as USGS Professional Paper 1707 (2005).
The folk force of the orphan concept: for three centuries Japan had a wave with no quake and America had dead trees with no date, two archives each holding half a catastrophe. The orphan framing now names the general problem, events recorded at the receiving end whose sources were never written down anywhere.
The claim: the orphan tsunami is proof of the archive's deeper thesis, that catastrophes are planetary, records are local, and only cross-archive collision reconstructs the event. The flood-myth literature adds the coda: the myths may be orphans too, waves whose earthquakes we have not yet dug up.
What else in the historical record is an orphan, an effect whose cause is missing from the same archive?