Civilizations

The Great Sphinx

conventionally dated c. 2500 BC
The largest monolith statue of the ancient world.
Interesting claims

The water erosion hypothesis

Geologist Robert Schoch argued in the 1990s that the Sphinx enclosure shows weathering from heavy rainfall, not wind and sand, implying a construction date of 7000 BC or earlier, millennia before dynastic Egypt. Popularized by Hancock's Fingerprints of the Gods.

Assessment: A minority view. Most geologists attribute the erosion to salt crystallization, flooding Nile water, and the soft limestone itself, all consistent with the standard date.
Documented

The conventional case

The Sphinx sits in a quarry context tied to Khafre's pyramid complex (c. 2500 BC), matches Old Kingdom masonry, and its temple's statues depict Khafre. No artifacts anywhere in Egypt predate 3000 BC at comparable sophistication.

Assessment: The mainstream dating stands on multiple independent lines of evidence, not authority.
Stories

Napoleon's cannonballs

The story every tourist hears: French soldiers shot the nose off for target practice, or in rage at the face's African features. It is told with total confidence in Cairo and in classrooms worldwide.

Assessment: Drawings made decades before Napoleon was born show the nose already gone. A 15th-century account blames an iconoclastic Sufi, who was lynched for it. The Napoleon story survives because it flatters our sense that vandals wear uniforms.
Sources and further reading
  1. Dream Stele of Thutmose IV, between the paws, c. 1400 BCE
  2. Inventory Stela, Late Period, the Khufu claim the card debates
  3. John Anthony West & Robert Schoch, Serpent in the Sky, 1992, the weathering argument
Worth asking

How much of what we call history is a date agreed upon before the evidence was in?

Open in the interactive archive
GR8YFILES · competing origin stories, labeled by the strength of their evidence · readers 14+