Documented: developed in Reproduction (1970) and Masculine Domination (1998): symbolic violence is gentle, imperceptible violence exercised through symbolic channels, communication, cognition, recognition, which works only through misrecognition, the dominated applying the dominators' categories to themselves. Its documented arena: pedagogy, where the school's classifications install the hierarchy as self-knowledge.
The documented criticism: the theory risks making the dominated into dupes, their acceptance manufactured by the very system being analyzed, an unfalsifiable loop. Bourdieu's defenders cite his Pascalian Meditations: the body is socialized, so complicity is not consent but conditioning, and the loop is the finding, not the flaw. The debate is alive in every sociology department.
The application beyond France: accent prestige, dress codes, professional polish, the grammar of politeness, each a documented site where dominant norms present as neutral standards and subordinate groups police themselves by them. The concept travels because the mechanism does: any standard that is one group's native habit and everyone else's exam is symbolic violence with an HR manual.
What kind of weapon is one the victim carries?