Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi, born Murcia, died Damascus: author of the Futuhat al-Makkiyya and the Fusus al-Hikam, teacher of wahdat al-wujud, the unity of being, the doctrine that existence is one and God is its only true reality. His school shaped Sufism, Persian poetry, and Ottoman theology; his defenders and prosecutors both fill libraries.
The permanent accusation: unity of being as pantheism in turban, God dissolved into everything, everything excused as God. His defenders answer that the doctrine distinguishes the Real from creation absolutely; the charge and the answer are both still being printed.
His subtlest tool: the barzakh, the isthmus between, imagination (khayal) as the intermediate world where spirit takes body and body takes spirit. Ibn Arabi built a physics of the in-between, and every later theory of the imaginal, including Jung's, walks his bridge, credited or not.
Can a doctrine be both a tradition's crown and its permanent accusation?