Elohim is the plural of eloah, yet governs singular verbs when referring to Israel's God. The plural-of-majesty explanation has real philological backing. But the text also says 'let us make man in our image' (Genesis 1:26) and 'the man has become like one of us' (3:22), and Psalm 82 puts elohim in a council of elohim. The academic reading, Heiser's divine council scholarship, accepts a genuine heavenly assembly. Wallis's reading: the plural means exactly what it says.
The story the rabbis themselves told: God consulted the angels at creation, which is why the text says 'us.' Midrashic tradition preserves the consultation while protecting the monotheism. The council was always in the story; the argument is over who sits on it.
Paul Wallis, the Anglican archdeacon turned hermeneutics renegade, renders elohim as the Powerful Ones, the Sky People: a team of beings, engineers of the human project, later flattened into a singular God by the 6th-century BC redactors who wove the name Yahweh through older elohim narratives. The seams, he argues, were never fully stitched.
The grammar anomaly is in every Bible ever printed. If the plural is just a figure of speech, why does the text keep lapsing into 'us' when it matters most?