Beliefs

Baphomet

BAF-oh-met
The Templars' alleged idol, a medieval garbling of Mahomet, redrawn by Eliphas Levi in 1856 as the Sabbatic Goat, the occult's most recognizable sigil.
Documented

The three lives

First life: Baphometh in Anselm of Ribemont's 1098 letter from Antioch, Old French for Mahomet. Second life: 1307, Philip IV's inquisition, a handful of torture confessions naming Baphomet as the Templar idol, descriptions wildly contradictory, retracted when the torture stopped, absent from every Templar document, and the Chinon Parchment, published 2007, showing Clement V absolved the order in 1308. Third life: Eliphas Levi's 1856 frontispiece, the Sabbatic Goat, solve and coagula on the arms, a Hermetic diagram of reconciled opposites Levi explicitly said was not Satan. The Church of Satan's sigil adoption in the 1960s completed the rebranding Levi never intended.

Assessment: The letter, the trial record, the Chinon Parchment, and Levi's text are documented. Three separate artifacts, seven centuries, one name.
Stories

The cipher readings

The esoteric literature generated its own etymologies: Nicolai's baphe metous, baptism of wisdom; Littre's reversed abbreviation, abbot of the temple of peace of all men; Schonfield's Atbash solution, Baphomet in Hebrew letters decoding to Sophia, wisdom, the reading The Da Vinci Code borrowed; and Crowley's BaphometR totaling 729, nine cubed, Father Mithras. Each solution is presented by its author as the key. Philologists keep voting for the crusader's mishearing, which has the unique defect of explaining everything and satisfying no one.

Assessment: The competing derivations are documented proposals. The archive files all four beside the Mahomet root, unsorted, as the house style demands.
Interesting claims

The idol built by its prosecutors

The claim: Baphomet is the purest case of a belief system manufactured by its enemies, the inquisition invented the idol to convict the order, occultism adopted the invention to spite the inquisition, and the modern sigil is a drawing of an accusation, meaning the devil in the picture was authored, in sequence, by a king's torturers and a deacon's pen. Verdict: the documented chain supports it almost completely, there is no pre-1307 Baphomet the entity, only Baphometh the name. The archive's closing note belongs to this whole wing: the most durable demons are legal documents. The Templars got the flames. The torturers got the debts cancelled. The name got a franchise. Solve et coagula indeed.

Assessment: undefined
Sources and further reading
  1. Anselm of Ribemont letter, 1098
  2. The 1307 trial transcripts
  3. The Chinon Parchment, 2007
  4. Levi, Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie (1854-1856)
Worth asking

If the devil's most famous image began as a transliteration error, what else in the demonology is a scribe's mistake with a franchise?

Open in the interactive archive
GR8YFILES · competing origin stories, labeled by the strength of their evidence · readers 14+